Competitor profile

SRI. LAL KISHOR GUPTA

They win 17% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
15 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.8 L
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 11.3% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded216.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1083.3%
By value₹2.5 Cr
11.3%
88.7%
Awarded₹27.8 L11.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.2 Cr88.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

UDD Secretary₹27.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹27.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S AMRENDER VERMA2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹17.2 L
won head-to-head
02
BALAJI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SIDH SIDDHI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MS NEHA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JAI MATA DI PAVER AND BRICK1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹18.8 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SURENDRA PRASAD2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹56.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSRI. LAL KISHOR awardedOthers

About SRI. LAL KISHOR GUPTA

SRI. LAL KISHOR GUPTA appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹27.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is UDD Secretary, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S AMRENDER VERMA, BALAJI ENTERPRISES and SIDH SIDDHI CONSTRUCTIONS. M/S AMRENDER VERMA bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SRI. LAL KISHOR GUPTA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.