Competitor profile

Sri Krishna Energy Services Inc.

They win 33% of what they bid, and 41% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.2 L
of ₹22.7 L bid — 40.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹22.7 L
40.6%
59.4%
Awarded₹9.2 L40.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹13.5 L59.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUNIL YADAV1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
02
KUSUM ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Amit Kumar Kumath0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Enterprises And Electric0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PUSHPENDRA SINGH RATHOR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Neeraj Kuril0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSri Krishna awardedOthers

About Sri Krishna Energy Services Inc.

Sri Krishna Energy Services Inc. appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹9.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUNIL YADAV, KUSUM ENTERPRISES and Amit Kumar Kumath. SUNIL YADAV bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Sri Krishna Energy Services Inc. won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.