Competitor profile

Sri Gulmoni Chakma

They win 45% of what they bid, and 47% of the value they chase.

38tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
5 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
38
38 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.6 Cr
of ₹5.5 Cr bid — 47.0% conversion
Win rate
44.7%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count38 bids
44.7%
47.4%
Awarded1744.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected37.9%
Lost1847.4%
By value₹5.5 Cr
47.0%
50.1%
Awarded₹2.6 Cr47.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.6 L2.8%
Lost₹2.8 Cr50.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹2.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Jitendra Kumar Nath0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MITHUN CHAKRABORTY2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹16.9 L
won head-to-head
03
KIRMOY CHAKMA2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹35.8 L
won head-to-head
04
Pankaj Sarkar0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Prasenjit Sarkar1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.4 L
won head-to-head
06
Dipankar Sarkar1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSri Gulmoni awardedOthers

About Sri Gulmoni Chakma

Sri Gulmoni Chakma appears as a bidder on 38 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 44.7% win rate — worth ₹2.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, PWD (DWS), at 60.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Jitendra Kumar Nath, MITHUN CHAKRABORTY and KIRMOY CHAKMA. Jitendra Kumar Nath bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Sri Gulmoni Chakma won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.