Competitor profile

SPORTS WORLD

They won all 4 of their bids with a result, worth ₹46.9 L.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.9 L
of ₹46.9 L bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
100.0%
Awarded4100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹46.9 L
100.0%
Awarded₹46.9 L100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AR Enterprises1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.7 L
won head-to-head
02
Ronext advance technology1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
03
C M ASSSOCIATES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹61,520
won head-to-head
04
I FIT SPORTS PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KINDERSPORTS LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
A & P Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSPORTS WORLD awardedOthers

About SPORTS WORLD

SPORTS WORLD appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹46.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Sports and Youth Welfare, at 79.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 48.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AR Enterprises, Ronext advance technology and C M ASSSOCIATES. AR Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SPORTS WORLD won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.