Competitor profile

sp.mathu

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
13 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹5.6 Cr bid — 27.9% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
40.0%
53.3%
Awarded1240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected26.7%
Lost1653.3%
By value₹5.6 Cr
27.9%
11.8%
60.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr27.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹65.9 L11.8%
Lost₹3.4 Cr60.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹1.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SRI VINAYAGA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS1 win · 28 shared tenders
₹12.1 L
won head-to-head
02
KKS ENGINEERS0 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹22.7 L
won head-to-head
04
JP ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS7 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹73.6 L
won head-to-head
05
vaidheeswara fabricators0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Ideal Construction and Engineering Works4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsp.mathu awardedOthers

About sp.mathu

sp.mathu appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SRI VINAYAGA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, KKS ENGINEERS and United Inspection And Engineering Services (KL) Private Limited. SRI VINAYAGA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS bid on 28 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; sp.mathu won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.