Competitor profile

M/S SONAM NAMGIAL

They win 7% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
10 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.3 L
of ₹3.8 Cr bid — 6.1% conversion
Win rate
7.1%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
92.9%
Awarded17.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1392.9%
By value₹3.8 Cr
93.9%
Awarded₹23.3 L6.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.6 Cr93.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Ladakh₹23.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S TSEWANG RIGZIN3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹62.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S STANZIN SONAM2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹48.9 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S TUNDUP YANGJOR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹35.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S KONCHOK TSULTIM GOVT CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S SONAM STANZIN1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6.0 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S CHEMET NAMGAIL GOVT CONTRACTOR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSONAM NAMGIAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SONAM NAMGIAL

About M/S SONAM NAMGIAL

M/S SONAM NAMGIAL appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.1% win rate — worth ₹23.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Ladakh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S TSEWANG RIGZIN, M/S STANZIN SONAM and M/S TUNDUP YANGJOR. M/S TSEWANG RIGZIN bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S SONAM NAMGIAL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.