Competitor profile

Smt Neerja Singh

They win 64% of what they bid, and 61% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
22 Dec 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.3 Cr
of ₹31.4 Cr bid — 61.4% conversion
Win rate
64.3%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count14 bids
64.3%
28.6%
Awarded964.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.1%
Lost428.6%
By value₹31.4 Cr
61.4%
17.1%
21.5%
Awarded₹19.3 Cr61.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.4 Cr17.1%
Lost₹6.7 Cr21.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

UPRRDA₹4.9 Cr25.2%

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Ms. Ratan Builders0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S PK TRIPATHI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KAPTAN SINGH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ekta Construction Company1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
MAA VAISHNODEVI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSmt Neerja awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Smt Neerja

About Smt Neerja Singh

Smt Neerja Singh appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 64.3% win rate — worth ₹19.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Dec 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, at 74.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA, Ms. Ratan Builders and M/S PK TRIPATHI. SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Smt Neerja Singh won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.