Competitor profile

smith sambare

They win 71% of what they bid — and 82% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 82.1% conversion
Win rate
71.4%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
71.4%
28.6%
Awarded571.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost228.6%
By value₹1.3 Cr
82.1%
17.9%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr82.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹23.3 L17.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate Urban Administration and Development₹1.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹1.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
yajuvendra juneja0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
shivam sambare1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹15.6 L
won head-to-head
03
CHETAN GHATODE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
shamrao gajbhiye0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
hitendra waghale0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NIKUNJ KALAMDHAD1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsmith sambare awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to smith sambare

About smith sambare

smith sambare appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 71.4% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh.

It most often bids against yajuvendra juneja, shivam sambare and CHETAN GHATODE. yajuvendra juneja bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; smith sambare won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.