Competitor profile

M/S. Situ Roy & Construction

They win 41% of what they bid, and 44% of the value they chase.

85tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
85
85 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
35
43 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹49.2 Cr
of ₹111.6 Cr bid — 44.1% conversion
Win rate
41.2%
of 85 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count85 bids
41.2%
50.6%
Awarded3541.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected78.2%
Lost4350.6%
By value₹111.6 Cr
44.1%
49.4%
Awarded₹49.2 Cr44.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.3 Cr6.5%
Lost₹55.1 Cr49.4%

Where they win

7 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹49.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Haran Ch. Das6 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹9.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
JUTAN SAHA4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹9.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Kamal Debnath5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SAIKAT BHATTACHARJEE1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹11.0 L
won head-to-head
05
BISHU CHARAN BISWAS3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SATISH DEBBARMA0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSitu Roy & awardedOthers

About M/S. Situ Roy & Construction

M/S. Situ Roy & Construction appears as a bidder on 85 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 85 decided bids, it was awarded 35 — a 41.2% win rate — worth ₹49.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, PWD (R and B), at 39.1% of what it has won, out of 7 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Haran Ch. Das, JUTAN SAHA and Kamal Debnath. Haran Ch. Das bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M/S. Situ Roy & Construction won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.