Competitor profile

SITALA MATA ENTERPRISE

They win 44% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹76.0 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 41.9% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
44.4%
11.1%
44.4%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost444.4%
By value₹1.8 Cr
41.9%
24.7%
33.4%
Awarded₹76.0 L41.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹44.8 L24.7%
Lost₹60.5 L33.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
J C M ENTERPRISE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAINBOW ENTERPRISE1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹44.8 L
won head-to-head
03
A G ENTERPRISE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MA SARADA TRADERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹32.5 L
won head-to-head
05
MAA JAGYODHATRI ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹10.3 L
won head-to-head
06
MUKUTMONIPUR TRAVELS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSITALA MATA awardedOthers

About SITALA MATA ENTERPRISE

SITALA MATA ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹76.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is South Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against J C M ENTERPRISE, RAINBOW ENTERPRISE and A G ENTERPRISE. J C M ENTERPRISE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SITALA MATA ENTERPRISE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.