Competitor profile

SIRLA LAXMAN RAO

They win 20% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

51tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
51
51 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
34 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.0 Cr
of ₹24.8 Cr bid — 20.2% conversion
Win rate
19.6%
of 51 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count51 bids
19.6%
13.7%
66.7%
Awarded1019.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected713.7%
Lost3466.7%
By value₹24.8 Cr
20.2%
10.6%
69.2%
Awarded₹5.0 Cr20.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.6 Cr10.6%
Lost₹17.1 Cr69.2%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

EIC-CIVIL₹1.8 Cr36.6%
Municipal Bodies₹1.6 Cr31.8%
CE RW I₹71.3 L14.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹5.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
D.HARISH KUMAR1 win · 25 shared tenders
₹50.9 L
won head-to-head
02
BEJIPURAM KHAGESWAR RAO1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
03
P MUTTI RAJU2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹61.6 L
won head-to-head
04
Akhyaya Kumar Sahu2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹75.4 L
won head-to-head
05
Kommuru Chakravarti4 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Jalumuru Bhargav3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSIRLA LAXMAN awardedOthers

About SIRLA LAXMAN RAO

SIRLA LAXMAN RAO appears as a bidder on 51 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 51 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 19.6% win rate — worth ₹5.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is EIC-CIVIL, at 36.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against D.HARISH KUMAR, BEJIPURAM KHAGESWAR RAO and P MUTTI RAJU. D.HARISH KUMAR bid on 25 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SIRLA LAXMAN RAO won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.