Competitor profile

SHUBHAM CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

19tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
18
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.5 L
of ₹18.5 Cr bid — 1.2% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
33.3%
11.1%
55.6%
Awarded633.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.1%
Lost1055.6%
By value₹18.5 Cr
20.6%
78.2%
Awarded₹22.5 L1.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.8 Cr20.6%
Lost₹14.4 Cr78.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAGAR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹5.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S RAJENDRA TRADERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹25.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SHIVAY CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.3 L
won head-to-head
04
AKHLESH KUMAR JAIN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ARCHANA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HARSH VARDHAN CONTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHUBHAM CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SHUBHAM CONSTRUCTION

SHUBHAM CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹22.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAGAR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER, M/S RAJENDRA TRADERS and SHIVAY CONSTRUCTION. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SHUBHAM CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.