Competitor profile

SHRISTI CONSTRUCTION

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 11% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹33.6 L
of ₹2.9 Cr bid — 11.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹2.9 Cr
11.4%
88.6%
Awarded₹33.6 L11.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.6 Cr88.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
YOGENDRA KUMAR PATEL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHAKTI SINGH RAJPUT0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHRI DEV BALAJI FORMATION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
04
UPYOGI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SANTOSH KUMAR LUNAWAT1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
06
Jay Shri Mahakal Construction1 win · 1 shared tender
₹30,969
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRISTI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SHRISTI CONSTRUCTION

SHRISTI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹33.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Narmada Valley Development Authority, at 96.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against YOGENDRA KUMAR PATEL, SHAKTI SINGH RAJPUT and SHRI DEV BALAJI FORMATION. YOGENDRA KUMAR PATEL bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SHRISTI CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.