Competitor profile

SHRIMATI RAJMANI CONSTRUCTION & TRADERS

They win 46% of what they bid, and 40% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.6 L
of ₹78.5 L bid — 40.3% conversion
Win rate
46.1%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
46.2%
53.8%
Awarded646.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost753.8%
By value₹78.5 L
40.3%
59.7%
Awarded₹31.6 L40.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹46.9 L59.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
OM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAJIV PATHAK0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SINGHNI INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
06
SUN SHINE CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRIMATI RAJMANI awardedOthers

About SHRIMATI RAJMANI CONSTRUCTION & TRADERS

SHRIMATI RAJMANI CONSTRUCTION & TRADERS appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 46.1% win rate — worth ₹31.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJ CONSTRUCTION, OM CONSTRUCTION and RAJIV PATHAK. RAJ CONSTRUCTION bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SHRIMATI RAJMANI CONSTRUCTION & TRADERS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.