Competitor profile

Shri Sariyapani Wala Infrastructure

They win 75% of what they bid, and 66% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.9 L
of ₹21.0 L bid — 66.2% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹21.0 L
66.2%
33.8%
Awarded₹13.9 L66.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹7.1 L33.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BSL ELECTRONICS KHAMARIYA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHIVAY ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MAA NARMADA ENTERPEISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹6.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Maa Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
balram patel0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHIVA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShri Sariyapani awardedOthers

About Shri Sariyapani Wala Infrastructure

Shri Sariyapani Wala Infrastructure appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹13.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BSL ELECTRONICS KHAMARIYA, SHIVAY ASSOCIATES and MAA NARMADA ENTERPEISES. BSL ELECTRONICS KHAMARIYA bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Shri Sariyapani Wala Infrastructure won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.