Competitor profile

SHRI MATA INFRASTRUCTURE

They win 25% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
10 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.7 L
of ₹34.1 L bid — 37.2% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹34.1 L
37.2%
62.8%
Awarded₹12.7 L37.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹21.4 L62.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹12.8 L
won head-to-head
02
KAVYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
K B CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
05
BHADE TRADERS AND FABRICS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
06
DHANANJAY KUMAR MISHRA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹15.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRI MATA INFRASTRUCTURE awardedOthers

About SHRI MATA INFRASTRUCTURE

SHRI MATA INFRASTRUCTURE appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹12.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Engineer-in-Chief - Water Resources Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ARYAN RAGHUWANSHI CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIYAL SUPPLIERS, KAVYA CONSTRUCTION and ROYAL CONSTRUCTION PROP SSHAFIQUE QURESHE. ARYAN RAGHUWANSHI CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIYAL SUPPLIERS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SHRI MATA INFRASTRUCTURE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.