Competitor profile

Shri Annamalai Power Generator

They win 25% of what they bid — and 38% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
28 Jan 2016last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹26.1 L
of ₹69.5 L bid — 37.6% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded225.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost675.0%
By value₹69.5 L
37.6%
62.4%
Awarded₹26.1 L37.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹43.3 L62.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PAJANCOA and RI₹16.4 L62.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Puducherry₹26.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ARR ESS ENTERPRISES4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹20.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SHAKTHI VINAYAGAA2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹16.8 L
won head-to-head
03
NAACHIA STORES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShri Annamalai awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Shri Annamalai

About Shri Annamalai Power Generator

Shri Annamalai Power Generator appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹26.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Jan 2016.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PAJANCOA and RI, at 62.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Puducherry. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ARR ESS ENTERPRISES, SHAKTHI VINAYAGAA and NAACHIA STORES. ARR ESS ENTERPRISES bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Shri Annamalai Power Generator won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.