Competitor profile

shreejeecoolingservice

They win 25% of what they bid, but only 14% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

16tenders on record
12buyer authorities
0states
26 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.7 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 13.8% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
Awarded425.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected850.0%
Lost425.0%
By value₹1.4 Cr
13.8%
44.2%
42.1%
Awarded₹18.7 L13.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹60.1 L44.2%
Lost₹57.2 L42.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAWAN ENGINEER2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MINDIA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
md irfan ahmed khan0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SWASTIK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ENVICAIR ENGINEERS PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HV AIRCONDITIONING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedshreejeecoolingservice awardedOthers

About shreejeecoolingservice

shreejeecoolingservice appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 12 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹18.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, at 44.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAWAN ENGINEER, MINDIA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD and md irfan ahmed khan. SAWAN ENGINEER bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; shreejeecoolingservice won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.