Competitor profile

Shree Krishna Enterprises

They win 40% of what they bid — and 56% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Mar 2024last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.4 Cr
of ₹15.0 Cr bid — 55.7% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
40.0%
20.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost120.0%
By value₹15.0 Cr
55.7%
37.4%
Awarded₹8.4 Cr55.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.6 Cr37.4%
Lost₹1.0 Cr6.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Rajasthan₹8.4 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VIPIN KUMAWAT1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S Bhagya Laxmi Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Shri Amol Agarwal1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SANDAL BUILDCON PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DHARTI DHAN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VEER TEJA JI ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹99.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShree Krishna awardedOthers

About Shree Krishna Enterprises

Shree Krishna Enterprises appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹8.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Mar 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against VIPIN KUMAWAT, M/S Bhagya Laxmi Construction and Shri Amol Agarwal. VIPIN KUMAWAT bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Shree Krishna Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.