Competitor profile

Shivraj Banola

They win 26% of what they bid — and 47% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

28tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
19
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.8 Cr
of ₹48.5 Cr bid — 47.1% conversion
Win rate
26.3%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count19 bids
26.3%
31.6%
42.1%
Awarded526.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected631.6%
Lost842.1%
By value₹48.5 Cr
47.1%
16.1%
36.8%
Awarded₹22.8 Cr47.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.8 Cr16.1%
Lost₹17.8 Cr36.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
mrs panch ghaticonstruction0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S DALIP SINGH ADHIKARI1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
G. S. Matiyani And Sons1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹9.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SATISH CHANDRA PANDEY0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHIVALIK CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DEVKI NANDAN JOSHI0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShivraj Banola awardedOthers

About Shivraj Banola

Shivraj Banola appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 26.3% win rate — worth ₹22.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against mrs panch ghaticonstruction, M/S DALIP SINGH ADHIKARI and G. S. Matiyani And Sons. mrs panch ghaticonstruction bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Shivraj Banola won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.