Competitor profile

shivika constructions and building material

They win 69% of what they bid, but only 39% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹94.2 L
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 39.0% conversion
Win rate
69.2%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
69.2%
30.8%
Awarded969.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost430.8%
By value₹2.4 Cr
39.0%
61.0%
Awarded₹94.2 L39.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.5 Cr61.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
02
AUDHESH KUMAR GAUTAM2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹47.4 L
won head-to-head
03
MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION WORK0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJESH RAI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹80.0 L
won head-to-head
05
SHRI SAINATH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAHAK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedshivika constructions awardedOthers

About shivika constructions and building material

shivika constructions and building material appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 69.2% win rate — worth ₹94.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER, AUDHESH KUMAR GAUTAM and MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION WORK. SHREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; shivika constructions and building material won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.