Competitor profile

Shivam Build Con Associates

They win 33% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.9 Cr
of ₹54.2 Cr bid — 23.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost233.3%
By value₹54.2 Cr
23.9%
37.6%
38.6%
Awarded₹12.9 Cr23.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹20.4 Cr37.6%
Lost₹20.9 Cr38.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SGF INFRA PVT LTD0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS AAA CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDERS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹9.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
MA ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
parshotam singh0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShivam Build awardedOthers

About Shivam Build Con Associates

Shivam Build Con Associates appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹12.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATTAN CHAND AND SONS, SGF INFRA PVT LTD and MS AAA CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDERS. RATTAN CHAND AND SONS bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Shivam Build Con Associates won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.