Competitor profile

Shiva Associates

They win 38% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
14 Feb 2024last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.2 Cr
of ₹26.7 Cr bid — 30.8% conversion
Win rate
38.5%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
38.5%
30.8%
30.8%
Awarded538.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected430.8%
Lost430.8%
By value₹26.7 Cr
30.8%
31.8%
37.4%
Awarded₹8.2 Cr30.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.5 Cr31.8%
Lost₹10.0 Cr37.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹6.4 Cr77.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹8.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ms Kay Kay Construction2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s V K Aggarwal0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PUNDEER CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
CHANDRAMAULESHWAR ASSOCIATES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Shivalik Infraventures (P) Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MARC ENGINEERIANS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShiva Associates awardedOthers

About Shiva Associates

Shiva Associates appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 38.5% win rate — worth ₹8.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Feb 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 77.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Ms Kay Kay Construction, M/s V K Aggarwal and PUNDEER CONSTRUCTION. Ms Kay Kay Construction bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Shiva Associates won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.