Competitor profile

M/S Shiv Kumar

They win 30% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.3 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 33.8% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
10.0%
60.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost660.0%
By value₹2.6 Cr
33.8%
17.9%
48.3%
Awarded₹89.3 L33.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹47.2 L17.9%
Lost₹1.3 Cr48.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S kuldeep kumar khullar2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹39.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S J.S.ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S JOHN VASSELLY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
k.s.construction2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹20.1 L
won head-to-head
05
shiv const co0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Babu Ram Sud and Sons0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShiv Kumar awardedOthers

About M/S Shiv Kumar

M/S Shiv Kumar appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹89.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S kuldeep kumar khullar, M/S J.S.ENTERPRISES and M/S JOHN VASSELLY. M/S kuldeep kumar khullar bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S Shiv Kumar won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.