Competitor profile

M/s Sheetal Associates

They win 25% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

62tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
2 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
60
62 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
44 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 Cr
of ₹23.8 Cr bid — 17.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 60 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count60 bids
25.0%
73.3%
Awarded1525.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.7%
Lost4473.3%
By value₹23.8 Cr
17.5%
82.4%
Awarded₹4.2 Cr17.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 L0.1%
Lost₹19.6 Cr82.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MALHI CONSTRUCTIONS12 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
somyaenterprises2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹45.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S Bharmouri Construction4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹90.4 L
won head-to-head
04
SUMIT TRADERS0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s Rajkumar Kalla0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
S. K. FRESH SUPPLIER3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSheetal Associates awardedOthers

About M/s Sheetal Associates

M/s Sheetal Associates appears as a bidder on 62 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 60 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹4.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 56.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MALHI CONSTRUCTIONS, somyaenterprises and M/S Bharmouri Construction. M/S MALHI CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 31 of the same tenders and won 12 of them; M/s Sheetal Associates won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.