Competitor profile

SHAMS FIROJ ALAM

They win 18% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹33.1 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 15.8% conversion
Win rate
18.2%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
18.2%
27.3%
54.5%
Awarded218.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected327.3%
Lost654.5%
By value₹2.1 Cr
15.8%
33.1%
51.1%
Awarded₹33.1 L15.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹69.5 L33.1%
Lost₹1.1 Cr51.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD Special Division₹17.8 L53.8%
RWD EinC₹15.3 L46.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹33.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DINESH KUMAR SAHU1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹14.9 L
won head-to-head
02
manoj kumar kewat0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RITESH KUMAR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MD SAIF ALI1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹37.7 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHALINI DEVI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GAUTAM KUMAR SAHU0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHAMS FIROJ awardedOthers

About SHAMS FIROJ ALAM

SHAMS FIROJ ALAM appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 18.2% win rate — worth ₹33.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD Special Division, at 53.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against DINESH KUMAR SAHU, manoj kumar kewat and RITESH KUMAR. DINESH KUMAR SAHU bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SHAMS FIROJ ALAM won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.