Competitor profile

SHAIKH AMUSUDIN MAHAMMAD

They win 7% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.9 L
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 4.3% conversion
Win rate
6.7%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
23.3%
70.0%
Awarded26.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected723.3%
Lost2170.0%
By value₹3.7 Cr
29.8%
65.9%
Awarded₹15.9 L4.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr29.8%
Lost₹2.4 Cr65.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

OPEPA Bhubaneswar₹12.3 L77.3%
CE RW I₹3.6 L22.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹15.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DIBYA SUPPLIERS2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹24.5 L
won head-to-head
02
TARESWAR LENKA1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹6.4 L
won head-to-head
03
FIDA HOSEN KHAN1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
04
BIJAY KUMAR PRADHAN3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹25.1 L
won head-to-head
05
BASANT KUMAR SAMANTARAY1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
06
JITENDRA KUMAR BISWAL1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹12.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHAIKH AMUSUDIN awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SHAIKH AMUSUDIN

About SHAIKH AMUSUDIN MAHAMMAD

SHAIKH AMUSUDIN MAHAMMAD appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 6.7% win rate — worth ₹15.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is OPEPA Bhubaneswar, at 77.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against DIBYA SUPPLIERS, TARESWAR LENKA and FIDA HOSEN KHAN. DIBYA SUPPLIERS bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SHAIKH AMUSUDIN MAHAMMAD won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.