Competitor profile

SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS

They win 25% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹14.9 Cr bid — 24.1% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹14.9 Cr
24.1%
75.9%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr24.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹11.3 Cr75.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
UTSAV UDYOG1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
DRS GROUP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S M.A.ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
RAMESHWAR SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
GREEN PARK0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
J.M.S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS

SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Jharkhand Police Housing Corporation Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against UTSAV UDYOG, DRS GROUP and M/S M.A.ENTERPRISES. UTSAV UDYOG bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.