Competitor profile

SEEMA CONSTRUCTION

They win 60% of what they bid, and 69% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 68.8% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
60.0%
10.0%
30.0%
Awarded660.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost330.0%
By value₹2.3 Cr
68.8%
28.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr68.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.7 L2.9%
Lost₹65.0 L28.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA SHITLA ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
02
PRATEEK CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹15.3 L
won head-to-head
03
SATYA SAI INFRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DILIP JAIN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
HARI KRIPA ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹36.1 L
won head-to-head
06
BHOLENATH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSEEMA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SEEMA CONSTRUCTION

SEEMA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 96.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MAA SHITLA ENTERPRISES, PRATEEK CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS and SATYA SAI INFRA. MAA SHITLA ENTERPRISES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SEEMA CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.