Competitor profile

M/S SATYAPAL SHARMA

They win 18% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
10 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.5 Cr
of ₹86.9 Cr bid — 14.3% conversion
Win rate
17.9%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
17.9%
32.1%
50.0%
Awarded517.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected932.1%
Lost1450.0%
By value₹86.9 Cr
14.3%
35.0%
50.6%
Awarded₹12.5 Cr14.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.4 Cr35.0%
Lost₹44.0 Cr50.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AYUB ALI & SONS5 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹10.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Archiconstructa & Valuation LLP2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹6.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GROUP ENGINEER SERVICE3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹9.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
choudhary contractors and suppliers1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
MAA VAISHNO CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Excellence Decor1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATYAPAL SHARMA awardedOthers

About M/S SATYAPAL SHARMA

M/S SATYAPAL SHARMA appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 17.9% win rate — worth ₹12.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AYUB ALI & SONS, Archiconstructa & Valuation LLP and GROUP ENGINEER SERVICE. AYUB ALI & SONS bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/S SATYAPAL SHARMA won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.