Competitor profile

SATYANANDA MAJHI

They win 14% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

56tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
31 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
56
56 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
47 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹19.5 Cr bid — 18.5% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 56 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count56 bids
14.3%
83.9%
Awarded814.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.8%
Lost4783.9%
By value₹19.5 Cr
18.5%
80.9%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr18.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.4 L0.6%
Lost₹15.7 Cr80.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹61.1 L17.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ODISHA ELECTRICAL AND CONSTRUCTIONS.3 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹97.4 L
won head-to-head
02
RANJAN KUMAR PANDA1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S. SHREE KRISHNA ENGINEERING0 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJIB MOHAMMED0 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANNAPURNA ROUT1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹11.4 L
won head-to-head
06
SAGARIKA GIRI2 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹65.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATYANANDA awardedOthers

About SATYANANDA MAJHI

SATYANANDA MAJHI appears as a bidder on 56 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 56 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation, at 83.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ODISHA ELECTRICAL AND CONSTRUCTIONS., RANJAN KUMAR PANDA and M/S. SHREE KRISHNA ENGINEERING. ODISHA ELECTRICAL AND CONSTRUCTIONS. bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SATYANANDA MAJHI won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.