Competitor profile

SATYAM FURNITURE HOUSE

They win 50% of what they bid — and 99% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
25 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.2 L
of ₹18.5 L bid — 98.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹18.5 L
98.8%
Awarded₹18.2 L98.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹21,5911.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ashirwad furnishers0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Divine Interiors0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NARINDER KUMAR SONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
U Like Furnishing0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
P K PATHAK0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
FAIRDEAL FURNISHING CO.1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12,902
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATYAM FURNITURE awardedOthers

About SATYAM FURNITURE HOUSE

SATYAM FURNITURE HOUSE appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹18.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DG, Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 33.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ashirwad furnishers, Divine Interiors and NARINDER KUMAR SONS. ashirwad furnishers bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; SATYAM FURNITURE HOUSE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.