Competitor profile

M/S SATYA PAUL SHARMA and SONS

They win 50% of what they bid — and 65% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
18 Aug 2023last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.8 Cr
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 65.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
50.0%
10.0%
40.0%
Awarded550.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹7.3 Cr
65.0%
33.6%
Awarded₹4.8 Cr65.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.2 L1.4%
Lost₹2.5 Cr33.6%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

I and FC₹3.5 Cr73.5%
University Department₹1.1 Cr22.9%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VIJAY KUMAR1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹71.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Sujan Singh0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ANIL SHARMA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JASBIR SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ABHILASH KOUSHAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RAINA CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATYA PAUL awardedOthers

About M/S SATYA PAUL SHARMA and SONS

M/S SATYA PAUL SHARMA and SONS appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹4.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Aug 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is I and FC, at 73.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against VIJAY KUMAR, M/s Sujan Singh and ANIL SHARMA. VIJAY KUMAR bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S SATYA PAUL SHARMA and SONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.