Competitor profile

SATNA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED

They win 14% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹7.4 Cr bid — 16.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
57.1%
28.6%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected457.1%
Lost228.6%
By value₹7.4 Cr
16.1%
24.1%
59.8%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr16.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr24.1%
Lost₹4.4 Cr59.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA AMBAY ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MANOJAVAYA BUILDCON1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹44.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SHANTI ELECTRICALS ENTERPRISES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹90.9 L
won head-to-head
04
MAA SHARDA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RADHESHYAM DANGI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Vijay Engineers0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATNA ENGINEERS awardedOthers

About SATNA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED

SATNA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Engineer-in-Chief - Water Resources Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA AMBAY ENTERPRISES, MANOJAVAYA BUILDCON and SHANTI ELECTRICALS ENTERPRISES. MAA AMBAY ENTERPRISES bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SATNA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.