Competitor profile

SATISH PANDEY

They win 71% of what they bid, and 65% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹4.8 Cr bid — 64.7% conversion
Win rate
71.4%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count14 bids
71.4%
28.6%
Awarded1071.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost428.6%
By value₹4.8 Cr
64.7%
35.3%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr64.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.7 Cr35.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAM NIWAS SHARMA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹22.1 L
won head-to-head
02
S R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
P L P CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SAIRAM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PUSHPENDRA SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BALAJI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATISH PANDEY awardedOthers

About SATISH PANDEY

SATISH PANDEY appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 71.4% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against RAM NIWAS SHARMA, S R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and P L P CONSTRUCTION. RAM NIWAS SHARMA bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SATISH PANDEY won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.