Competitor profile

Sati Mata Construction

They win 7% of what they bid, and 0.1% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 L
of ₹19.8 Cr bid — 0.1% conversion
Win rate
6.7%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
40.0%
53.3%
Awarded16.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected640.0%
Lost853.3%
By value₹19.8 Cr
44.6%
55.3%
Awarded₹2.4 L0.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.8 Cr44.6%
Lost₹11.0 Cr55.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sultan Ahmad Mansuri2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Gheesu Singh Choudhary2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
PRAHLAD CHOUDHARY DRILLING CO3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹3.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Lucky Enterprizes1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SURESH KUMAR JAT1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹11.0 L
won head-to-head
06
BALRAM CHOUDHARY EARTH MOVERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSati Mata Construction awardedOthers

About Sati Mata Construction

Sati Mata Construction appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 6.7% win rate — worth ₹2.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sultan Ahmad Mansuri, Gheesu Singh Choudhary and PRAHLAD CHOUDHARY DRILLING CO. Sultan Ahmad Mansuri bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Sati Mata Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.