Competitor profile

Sarika Engineering Works

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 9% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.3 L
of ₹50.0 L bid — 8.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
16.7%
50.0%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost350.0%
By value₹50.0 L
21.6%
69.7%
Awarded₹4.3 L8.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.8 L21.6%
Lost₹34.9 L69.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s. Mamta Construction2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹26.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Chitra Constrction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BIRENDRA KUMAR TIWARI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
LEELAWATI KUMARI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S MOHMMAD IMRAN ANSARI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAJRAPPA REPAIRING CENTRE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSarika Engineering awardedOthers

About Sarika Engineering Works

Sarika Engineering Works appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹4.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s. Mamta Construction, M/s Chitra Constrction and BIRENDRA KUMAR TIWARI. M/s. Mamta Construction bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Sarika Engineering Works won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.