Competitor profile

SAMPA FEED AND CHICKS AGENCY

They win 38% of what they bid — and 95% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Jun 2023last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.9 Cr
of ₹5.2 Cr bid — 95.2% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost562.5%
By value₹5.2 Cr
95.2%
Awarded₹4.9 Cr95.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹24.6 L4.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹4.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Biplab Debnath0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Nikhil Rn Chakraborty0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Puspa Varieties0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ATIKUL ISLAM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAMPA FEED awardedOthers

About SAMPA FEED AND CHICKS AGENCY

SAMPA FEED AND CHICKS AGENCY appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹4.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Jun 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and HoFF, at 99.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Biplab Debnath, NA and Nikhil Rn Chakraborty. Biplab Debnath bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SAMPA FEED AND CHICKS AGENCY won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.