Competitor profile

SAKHARAM YADAV

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 15% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.8 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 14.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹2.6 Cr
14.6%
66.7%
18.6%
Awarded₹38.8 L14.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr66.7%
Lost₹49.4 L18.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAM KUMAR AJMERA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AROHI INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Nandi Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Maa narmada0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KHARE BROTHERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAKHARAM YADAV awardedOthers

About SAKHARAM YADAV

SAKHARAM YADAV appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹38.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Narmada Valley Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAM KUMAR AJMERA, AROHI INFRASTRUCTURE and SHRI KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION AND BOREWELL. RAM KUMAR AJMERA bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SAKHARAM YADAV won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.