Competitor profile

SAJI M M

They win 62% of what they bid, but only 42% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

21tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹41.7 L
of ₹98.2 L bid — 42.5% conversion
Win rate
61.9%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
61.9%
19.0%
19.0%
Awarded1361.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected419.0%
Lost419.0%
By value₹98.2 L
42.5%
48.7%
Awarded₹41.7 L42.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.6 L8.8%
Lost₹47.8 L48.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Forest Department₹8.5 L20.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹41.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Archetec Constructions4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
02
VINOD T N0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Jomy Mathew1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹6.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Axis Builders1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.6 L
won head-to-head
05
SURESH BABU0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Roy Mathew0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAJI M M awardedOthers

About SAJI M M

SAJI M M appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 61.9% win rate — worth ₹41.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 79.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Archetec Constructions, VINOD T N and Jomy Mathew. Archetec Constructions bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SAJI M M won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.