Competitor profile

SAINKO SYSTEMS

They win 30% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

20tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
16 May 2026last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹29.4 Cr bid — 9.6% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
30.0%
45.0%
25.0%
Awarded630.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected945.0%
Lost525.0%
By value₹29.4 Cr
80.4%
10.0%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr9.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹23.6 Cr80.4%
Lost₹3.0 Cr10.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MD - BRIDCUL₹1.3 Cr45.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MITTAL MACHINES PVT LTD5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹11.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
JOSHI ELECTRIC WORKS0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
CONCEPT ELECTRONICS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹8.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SHREE BALAJI ASSOCIATES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹46.2 L
won head-to-head
06
SMA ENERGY & INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAINKO SYSTEMS awardedOthers

About SAINKO SYSTEMS

SAINKO SYSTEMS appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD Uttarakhand Agriculture Produce Marketing Board Rudrapur, at 54.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MITTAL MACHINES PVT LTD, JOSHI ELECTRIC WORKS and CONCEPT ELECTRONICS. MITTAL MACHINES PVT LTD bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; SAINKO SYSTEMS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.