Competitor profile

SAI KRIPA TRADERS

They win 78% of what they bid — and 99.8% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.1 L
of ₹23.2 L bid — 99.8% conversion
Win rate
77.8%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
77.8%
22.2%
Awarded777.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost222.2%
By value₹23.2 L
99.8%
Awarded₹23.1 L99.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4,7730.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PANKAJ ELECTRONICS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹17,249
won head-to-head
02
NEMA ELECTRONICS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PRATIBHA TRADING COMPANY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹700
won head-to-head
04
VARDHAMAN SUPPLIERS BUDHI BALAGHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ASHISH KUMAR AWADHIYA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HAKIM PATEL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAI KRIPA TRADERS awardedOthers

About SAI KRIPA TRADERS

SAI KRIPA TRADERS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 77.8% win rate — worth ₹23.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 98.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PANKAJ ELECTRONICS, NEMA ELECTRONICS and PRATIBHA TRADING COMPANY. PANKAJ ELECTRONICS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SAI KRIPA TRADERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.