Competitor profile

SAI FURNITURE

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 11% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
16 Dec 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 L
of ₹12.4 L bid — 10.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹12.4 L
10.8%
89.2%
Awarded₹1.3 L10.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹11.0 L89.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NATIONAL TRADERS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹37,442
won head-to-head
02
Durgesh Traders2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹1.1 L
won head-to-head
03
SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
04
₹85,380
won head-to-head
05
PRADEEP KUMAR DWIVEDI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GAURAV ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAI FURNITURE awardedOthers

About SAI FURNITURE

SAI FURNITURE appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Dec 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 31.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NATIONAL TRADERS, Durgesh Traders and SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA. NATIONAL TRADERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SAI FURNITURE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.