Competitor profile

SAFIKUL ISLAM

They win 14% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
29 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
7
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹13.5 Cr bid — 10.9% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
71.4%
14.3%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected571.4%
Lost114.3%
By value₹13.5 Cr
10.9%
78.2%
10.9%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr10.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.6 Cr78.2%
Lost₹1.5 Cr10.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-ASM₹1.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Biswadev Das2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Sri Pradipta Choudhury0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Ganesh Ch. Karmakar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MD JAKIR HUSSAIN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TANMOY DEY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SUBHAM ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAFIKUL ISLAM awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SAFIKUL ISLAM

About SAFIKUL ISLAM

SAFIKUL ISLAM appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-ASM, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Biswadev Das, Sri Pradipta Choudhury and Ganesh Ch. Karmakar. Biswadev Das bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SAFIKUL ISLAM won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.