Competitor profile

SABEEL AHMAD MAGRAY

They win 25% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
7 Nov 2023last award
Total bids
16
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.8 Cr
of ₹57.4 Cr bid — 27.6% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded425.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected425.0%
Lost850.0%
By value₹57.4 Cr
27.6%
29.4%
43.1%
Awarded₹15.8 Cr27.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.9 Cr29.4%
Lost₹24.7 Cr43.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Mehboob Ahmed and Sons0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Rattan Chand & Sons0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Mohd Yousuf Shan0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ramesh chander0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Abdul Quyoom Shan1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹83.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Itec Infra Global Pvt Ltd2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSABEEL AHMAD awardedOthers

About SABEEL AHMAD MAGRAY

SABEEL AHMAD MAGRAY appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹15.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Nov 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 66.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Mehboob Ahmed and Sons, Rattan Chand & Sons and Mohd Yousuf Shan. M/s Mehboob Ahmed and Sons bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SABEEL AHMAD MAGRAY won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.