Competitor profile

M/S. S. M. ENTERPRISES

They win 27% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
18 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.3 L
of ₹45.5 L bid — 22.7% conversion
Win rate
26.7%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
26.7%
40.0%
33.3%
Awarded426.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected640.0%
Lost533.3%
By value₹45.5 L
22.7%
45.2%
32.1%
Awarded₹10.3 L22.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹20.6 L45.2%
Lost₹14.6 L32.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S A.K. TRADING2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
02
S S ENGINEERING WORKS3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹6.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S. N. R. ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DOZTECH LINKERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S K B ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
06
META ELECTRIC1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS. M. ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S. S. M. ENTERPRISES

M/S. S. M. ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 26.7% win rate — worth ₹10.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 61.4% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S A.K. TRADING, S S ENGINEERING WORKS and M/S. N. R. ENTERPRISES. M/S A.K. TRADING bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S. S. M. ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.