Competitor profile

S. M. Construction

They win 28% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

87tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
87
87 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
24
50 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹107.4 Cr
of ₹559.0 Cr bid — 19.2% conversion
Win rate
27.6%
of 87 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count87 bids
27.6%
14.9%
57.5%
Awarded2427.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1314.9%
Lost5057.5%
By value₹559.0 Cr
19.2%
33.2%
47.6%
Awarded₹107.4 Cr19.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹185.4 Cr33.2%
Lost₹266.2 Cr47.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹107.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
O.P. Gupta Constructions Pvt Ltd4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹14.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s S.P. Agarwal and Co.5 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹21.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S Ashok kumar Jain2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹8.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Ms Ankita Construction1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M.R.ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹7.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S GRM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS. M. Construction awardedOthers

About S. M. Construction

S. M. Construction appears as a bidder on 87 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 87 decided bids, it was awarded 24 — a 27.6% win rate — worth ₹107.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 99.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against O.P. Gupta Constructions Pvt Ltd, M/s S.P. Agarwal and Co. and M/S Ashok kumar Jain. O.P. Gupta Constructions Pvt Ltd bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; S. M. Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.