Competitor profile

M/s S.M. Construction

They win 17% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

45tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
41
45 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹13.0 Cr bid — 16.3% conversion
Win rate
17.1%
of 41 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count41 bids
17.1%
78.0%
Awarded717.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected24.9%
Lost3278.0%
By value₹13.0 Cr
16.3%
79.9%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr16.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹50.3 L3.9%
Lost₹10.4 Cr79.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MUKTA AND COMPANY2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹37.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Sumer Associates3 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹64.8 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s SCHOLASTIC ENTERPRISES5 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Balaji Associate0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
durgey traders3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
jmd engineers1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹34.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.M. Construction awardedOthers

About M/s S.M. Construction

M/s S.M. Construction appears as a bidder on 45 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 41 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 17.1% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MUKTA AND COMPANY, M/s Sumer Associates and M/s SCHOLASTIC ENTERPRISES. MUKTA AND COMPANY bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s S.M. Construction won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.