Competitor profile

M/S S.K.M Construction

They win 8% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

52tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
17 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
52
52 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.9 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 7.3% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 52 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count52 bids
82.7%
Awarded47.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected4382.7%
Lost59.6%
By value₹1.9 Cr
84.6%
Awarded₹13.9 L7.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr84.6%
Lost₹15.7 L8.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S V.K ENTERPRISES23 wins · 47 shared tenders
₹80.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S KULDEEP ENGINEERING WORKS21 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹72.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S CHIRAG ENTERPRISES2 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹7.4 L
won head-to-head
04
YES ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
N K ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S KHUSHBOO REPAIRING WORKS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹76,120
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.K.M Construction awardedOthers

About M/S S.K.M Construction

M/S S.K.M Construction appears as a bidder on 52 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 52 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹13.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S V.K ENTERPRISES, M/S KULDEEP ENGINEERING WORKS and M/S CHIRAG ENTERPRISES. M/S V.K ENTERPRISES bid on 47 of the same tenders and won 23 of them; M/S S.K.M Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.