Competitor profile

S G S Enterprises

They win 14% of what they bid — and 31% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
24 Dec 2024last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.9 Cr
of ₹9.3 Cr bid — 31.0% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
14.3%
78.6%
Awarded214.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.1%
Lost1178.6%
By value₹9.3 Cr
31.0%
60.9%
Awarded₹2.9 Cr31.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹74.7 L8.1%
Lost₹5.6 Cr60.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Tomar Enterprises7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Rana Real Estate1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹74.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Yashpal singh0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SINGO ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGI1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹15.6 L
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS G S awardedOthers

About S G S Enterprises

S G S Enterprises appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹2.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Dec 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bharat Electronics Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Tomar Enterprises, Rana Real Estate and M/s Yashpal singh. M/s Tomar Enterprises bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; S G S Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.